Funny Jokes
Funny Pictures Funny Quotes Funny Videos Weird News One Liners

  Categories

Blonde Jokes
Couple Jokes
Food/Drink Jokes
Professionals Jokes
Point to be Noted Jokes
Kids Jokes
Animals Jokes
Other Jokes Jokes
Funny Pictures
Funny Videos
Strange News
chuck norris facts Jokes
Optical illusions
chuck norris
Funny Animal
yo mama jokes
Funny Christmas
Fat funny people
Inspirational quotes
Funny Quotes
one liners
Funny commercials
Funny moments
Weird Stuff
Funny Questions
Random questions
Pick up lines
Funny phrases




Bookmark

Texas judge who slept with the prosecutor in a death-penalty case -
Category: News
Texas judge who slept with the prosecutor in a death-penalty case

 
 

When the U.S. Supreme Court denied Charles Dean Hood's appeal last week, it was done in a one-sentence, unsigned order. Hood is a Texas death-row inmate who was convicted of murdering two people in 1990. Long after the conclusion of the trial, it became clear that his trial judge and prosecutor had been secretly involved in a years-long extramarital affair. Because they were both married, they denied the affair?even to Hood's death-penalty lawyers. After the clandestine relationship finally came to light, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected Hood's challenge in two curt sentences last September, finding that his lawyers had waited too long to raise the issue on appeal. How Hood was to have raised the conflict of interest when the existence of the affair was not conclusively established until 2008, when the judge and prosecutor were forced to admit it under oath, is not explained.

Hood has already been granted a new sentencing hearing because the Texas appeals court has acknowledged that the jury instructions were improper, but prosecutors say they will again seek the death penalty. In any event, resentencing Hood doesn't resolve the fundamental problem with the case. The issue here is whether any reasonable person would believe that a criminal trial at which one's prosecutor and judge are secretly in love could ever be fair. And that's the issue the courts keep refusing to address.

Last year, the Supreme Court handed down a blockbuster opinion in Caperton v. Massey, a case testing whether a justice on West Virginia's highest court should have recused himself from hearing an appeal in which one of the parties?Don Blankenship of A.T. Massey Coal Co.?had just donated $3 million to his judicial election campaign. Writing for a sharply divided 5?4 court, Justice Anthony Kennedy called the appearance of a conflict of interest in this case so "extreme" that the judge's failure to recuse himself undermined the constitutional right to due process. The Hood appeal to the Supreme Court essentially asked whether a judge might be as compromised by great sex as by big money. In his filings, Hood argued that the trial judge's "long-term, intimate sexual relationship and later close friendship with [the prosecutor] attuned her to his professional and personal interests and made those interests her own." Hood said that unlike the Caperton case, in which Blankenship's financial support of the judge was a matter of public knowledge, the Texas judge was more compromised because she kept her relationship a secret.

 

 
read more


Reference:
www.slate.com


Dated
2010-04-26



Share |


Rate this News
Average Good V.Good Excellent


Best Jokes | Crazy Pics | Strange News | Crazy Video
Copyright 2013 Free-Jokes-Online All rights reserved.